
Age Discrimination
Age Discrimination Lawyers - Washington D.C.
Age discrimination laws safeguard individuals from unfair treatment based on age. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) in the US prohibits age bias against employees aged 40 or older. It covers hiring, promotions, layoffs, benefits, and job assignments. Some states offer added protections. If you've experienced age discrimination, consult an employment lawyer for guidance on your rights and legal recourse.
We understand the challenges individuals face when dealing with age discrimination in the workplace. Our team of experienced Washington D.C. age discrimination lawyers is here to provide you with the legal representation and guidance you need to protect your rights and fight against discriminatory practices.
Call our age discrimination attorneys in Washington D.C. at 202-831-8190 to seek justice for any workplace discrimination you've faced or are facing.
How Can We Help
Our age Discrimination Lawyers have extensive knowledge and expertise in employment law, specifically related to age discrimination. We work tirelessly to ensure that individuals who have been unfairly treated due to their age receive the justice they deserve.
Whether you have been denied a job opportunity, subjected to unfair treatment, or wrongfully terminated based on your age, our age discrimination lawyers will diligently investigate your case, gather evidence, and build a strong legal strategy to pursue your claim.
Our team understands that age discrimination can have a significant impact on your career, financial stability, and overall well-being. We are committed to fighting for your rights and holding employers accountable for their discriminatory actions.
Why Choose Our Washington D.C Law Firm
When you choose Clark Law Group, you can expect personalized attention and dedicated advocacy from our age discrimination attorneys. We believe in building strong attorney-client relationships based on trust and open communication.
Our age discrimination attorneys will guide you through the entire legal process, explaining your rights, options, and potential outcomes along the way. We will work closely with you to understand your unique circumstances, gather all necessary information, and develop a customized legal strategy tailored to your specific needs.
Contact Our Age Discrimination Attorneys in Washington D.C.
Whether through negotiation, mediation, or litigation, our age discrimination attorneys will aggressively pursue the best possible outcome for your case. We are committed to ensuring that your voice is heard and that justice is served.
If you believe you have been a victim of age discrimination in the workplace, don't hesitate to seek legal advice. Contact our Age Discrimination Lawyers at Clark Law Group in DC, DC today to schedule a consultation and take the first step towards protecting your rights and fighting against age discrimination.
Call our age discrimination attorneys in Washington D.C. at 202-831-8190 to seek justice for any workplace discrimination you've faced or are facing.
Case Results
-
LINCOLN-ODUMU V. MEDICAL FACULTY ASSOCS.
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88659 (D.D.C. July 8, 2016) Holding that the D.C. Wage Payment Collection Law protects employees of DC employer who are dispatched outside of DC to telework from home.
-
JAFARI V. OLD DOMINION TRANSIT MANAGEMENT CO.
462 Fed.Appx. 385 (4th Cir. 2012) Holding that an employee’s intracompany complaint may constitute protected activity within meaning of FLSA’s anti-retaliation provision.
-
FRANCOIS V. OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION
1601-0007-18 (D.C. Office of Employee Appeals, July 18, 2019) Denying OSSE’s petition to review the AJ’s ruling that OSSE did not have requisite cause to remove the complainant employee from her employment.
-
CONGRESS V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
324 F.Supp.3d 164 (D.D.C. 2018) Holding that employee stated claims of disability discrimination and retaliation.
-
CHURCHILL V. PRINCE GEORGE’S CTY. PUB. SCH.
No. PWG-17-980, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197713 (D. Md. Dec. 1, 2017) Holding that the employee stated a claim of sexual orientation discrimination, sex stereotyping discrimination, and retaliation.