Federal Government Employee Benefits Claims

Washington, D.C. Federal Employee Benefits Claims Attorneys

Enforcing Benefits Claims for Public & Federal Sector Employees in D.C. & Chicago, IL

Federal and public service employees receive stellar benefits that are unavailable to many private sector workers.

When you dedicate your career to teaching in the classroom or assisting others throughout the community, you are rewarded for your commitment with generous packages that cover disability, health insurance, and retirement benefits.

As the structure and policies of these plans differ between public and private sector employees, so does the process for appealing a denied benefits claim.

If you are struggling with a medical issue or are nearing your retirement, your inability to receive the financial assistance you’ve earned can have devastating consequences. Successfully appealing a rejected benefits claim requires a professional with a specific skill set.

Contact

Fill Out the Form Below to Get Started

First Name
Please enter your first name.
Last Name
Please enter your last name.
Phone
Please enter your phone number.

This isn't a valid phone number.
Email
Please enter your email address.

This isn't a valid email address.
Are you a new client?
Please make a selection.
How can we help you?
Please enter a message.

Case Results

LINCOLN-ODUMU V. MEDICAL FACULTY ASSOCS.
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88659 (D.D.C. July 8, 2016) Holding that the D.C. Wage Payment Collection Law protects employees of DC employer who are dispatched outside of DC to telework from home.
JAFARI V. OLD DOMINION TRANSIT MANAGEMENT CO.
462 Fed.Appx. 385 (4th Cir. 2012) Holding that an employee’s intracompany complaint may constitute protected activity within meaning of FLSA’s anti-retaliation provision.
FRANCOIS V. OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION
1601-0007-18 (D.C. Office of Employee Appeals, July 18, 2019) Denying OSSE’s petition to review the AJ’s ruling that OSSE did not have requisite cause to remove the complainant employee from her employment.
CONGRESS V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
324 F.Supp.3d 164 (D.D.C. 2018) Holding that employee stated claims of disability discrimination and retaliation.
CHURCHILL V. PRINCE GEORGE’S CTY. PUB. SCH.
No. PWG-17-980, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197713 (D. Md. Dec. 1, 2017) Holding that the employee stated a claim of sexual orientation discrimination, sex stereotyping discrimination, and retaliation.